第 9節中指出：“任何僅出於追求知識或倫理，而非出於對律法的信仰而接受諾亞律法的人，被称为'Chacham U'mot HaOlam'（智慧的外邦人）。

这就是 Chassid（義人）和 Chacham（智慧人）的区别。我们的一些先哲們偏爱 義人，但也有人则偏爱 智慧人。

 简介：

接受諾亞律法的依据是什么？是堅信摩西的律法書？还是出於內心的道德感召？

The Jewish people, the Israelites, have important duties they must uphold toward Noahides—treating them with honesty and love. This requires identification, which is why the acceptance of the commandments takes place before a court.

Just as any person who becomes a citizen of any country accepts that country’s laws, whether they are to their advantage or not, a person who wants to become a Noahide and accept that status also accepts the binding nature of this constitution, even before they decide to observe its commandments.

As part of Jewish tradition, as it is taught in houses of Jewish learning, there exists an entire course of study called “Noahide Law,” which has been known to the sages of Israel throughout the generations.

We do not possess a sense of arrogant superiority, but rather bear the responsibility of repairing the world. Unlike other traditions that claim a universal role but turn their adherents into imperialists, imposing their identity on others, Judaism does not seek to obliterate the cultural wealth of people. On the contrary, it is content with the role of shining forth rather than dominating.

The supreme moral ideal is "righteousness and justice," as the Book of Genesis states. The practical realization of this unity is evident both in the wars of the State of Israel (despite all the accusations against it) and in the political and social fabric. In a country characterized by fair treatment of a hostile minority within it, we have succeeded in uniting mercy with justice.

According to Israel, neither God nor man is at the center, but rather the dialogue between them, with man’s active participation in completing the act of creation.

以色列一直以來都關注生存和經濟繁榮的問題，，一般而言，以色列傳統的精神思考和靈性思考一直以來都在以色列社會內部討論和交流；而較少與外在的文化有過接觸。也就是說，以色列人民的思考成果在以色列人民中交流和討論，而沒有外部的介入。現在是顯明以色列信仰的普世信息與義務的時候了，這是關乎以色列信仰為新世界、新時代作出怎樣貢獻的重大問題。

There is a tremendous struggle today over the question of the values by which we should live our lives. In other words, contemporary struggles differ from those of the past. Today, the battle is not about power and who controls, exploits, or oppresses. Instead, the struggles are about which values we should follow. Are they the values of liberal Western democracy, the values of Islam, or the values of Eastern spirituality? This struggle is commonly referred to today as the clash of civilizations. The primary battle is between the various facets of the Western world and the Islamic world.