Liquid error (sections/custom_mobile-menu line 86): Expected handle to be a String but got LinkListDrop
  • Group 27 Login

Parshat Shoftim
The Quest for Desirable Governance:
Unveiling the Torah's Call for Political Influence

Parshat Shoftim discusses a principle that is known in the modern legal system as the separation of powers. The Israelite society was to be built upon four governing institutions, each with partial authorities, and their main titles are: King, Judge, Priest, and Prophet. It is understood that these institutions take different forms throughout generations. The king is not always a king; sometimes it can be a parliamentary democracy. It can be a parliament or  any governing body, but it is just one part of the governance. The governance is divided among the king, the judge, the priest, and the prophet.

The question arises: What is the most desirable form of governance? Does the Torah favor a king, or does it not favor a king? To this, the Torah says, "Appoint over you a king like all the nations around you."  It appears to instruct that, only then shall you appoint a king over the Israelite Nation. This means that as the political culture evolves and we see that states governed by a king are more organized than states without a king, then we know that the time has come to appoint a king over ourselves-  like all the nations around us.

And here arises a question: How is it possible that something as central as the form of governance is dependent on the political culture of the nations of the world at that time? The answer is very simple. The very reason that God demanded His people to establish a state and not suffice with the establishment of a cosmopolitan or universal religion is to influence the nations of the world. The central fulcrum that moves matters in this world is the political tool. Therefore, the Torah demanded that Israel establish a political entity, a state. And the purpose of this state is to influence the nations of the world through their states. And one cannot influence the influenced if there is no minimal resemblance between the influencer and the influenced.

This is the reason that the Torah demanded that when we establish a political entity, so that we too be able to influence through the political culture of the world.

 

More Weekly Portions

羨慕與嫉妒 :巴蘭預言的二重性

在Parashat Balak部分,巴蘭是列國偉大的先知,他對以色列的態度體現出羡慕和嫉妒的複雜混合。雖然他想要詛咒以色列,但最終他是祝福了以色列。說明了聖靈和預言的影響力。巴蘭自相矛盾的態度也是更為廣泛的反猶主義和受寵兒童精神分析的主題。

律法書強調希望,神聖預言在會堂中的重要意義是,聖靈對全人類的潛在影響力,得到米德拉什.塔納.D.貝.以利亞

<Midrash Tanna D'bei Eliyahu>的肯定和支持。

從死亡到永生, 紅母牛的潔淨之路

在Parashat Hukat中,紅母牛<Para Aduma>儀式象徵著從死亡的污穢中得以潔淨,死亡的污穢源自知識樹中的罪。儀式涉及到將灰燼用活水調和,分別代表了身體和靈魂。象徵著通過復活來恢復生命。這一過程儘管具備象徵性的清晰度,但強調了一個神聖的奧秘:生與死之間的過渡,遠在人類的理解力之外。米德拉什突出並強調了紅母牛的奧秘,以及復活的重要性和神聖意志深不可測的本質

領導力的再界定:,可拉的叛亂給我們今天的啟迪

可拉、大丹、亞比蘭和250名“供香者”對摩西和亞倫的反叛,表現出了律法書中所記敘的紛爭和合法性領導力之間的複雜動態關係。可拉有其高標準的一面,大丹和亞比蘭則是小陰謀家。本文說明了合法領導力受質疑的原因。反叛發生在摩西打碎石板之後,理由是摩西和亞倫已經喪失了領導資格。這一歷史敘事告訴我們:不要因為有錯誤,就匆忙地提出罷免領袖。有時看似錯誤的舉動,卻是對神聖意志的實現。可拉一黨的叛亂告訴我們:,要在領導力和神聖意志的貫徹上作出選擇。

Search