Liquid error (sections/custom_mobile-menu line 86): Expected handle to be a String but got LinkListDrop
  • Group 27 Login

Forging Destiny: Joseph's Goblet, Family Bonds,
and the Struggle to Save Benjamin
[מקץ]

What's the whole story behind the cup in the Miketz saga? What did Joseph aim to achieve by concealing the goblet in Benjamin's sack? Since we already know the end of the story, we might assume that Joseph wanted to test his brothers and see if they were willing to sacrifice themselves to save Benjamin. However, that's a hindsight perspective after reading the continuation of the biblical story.

What was Joseph thinking at that moment?

In my opinion, the solution lies at the beginning of the passage when Joseph's two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim, are born in Egypt. The text explains the names: "And Joseph named the firstborn Manasseh, for 'God has caused me to forget all my toil and all my father's house.' And the second one he named Ephraim, for 'God has made me fruitful in the land of my affliction.'" (Genesis 41:51-52). Now, it becomes clear objectively. Joseph seems to want to disconnect from his father's house, forget his father, and succeed in Egypt.

To his surprise, his ten brothers arrive during the famine, something he did not expect. When he meets them, it's mentioned: "And Joseph remembered the dreams that he had dreamed about them" (Genesis 42:9).

What did he remember in the dreams? That there were not just ten stars but 11 stars! He recalls Benjamin. Now, he fears that Benjamin might be in danger, just as Joseph, Rachel's son, was cast away from the family. Maybe Benjamin is also cast away from the father's family. 

Joseph wants to save Benjamin, and the whole scheme of hiding the goblet is an attempt to separate Benjamin from his brothers.

If Joseph's idea had succeeded, and his proposal had been accepted ("The man in whose possession the (silver) goblet was found shall be my slave, but as for you, go up in peace to your father" - Genesis 43:17), he might have thought that Benjamin would stay with him in Egypt. His brothers would never return to him.

He did not expect that Judah would not allow it. 

Joseph was surprised to find out that Judah already understood that there was a bond among the brothers (as he declared to his father in Genesis 42:9 - "I will guarantee him"). 

All of Israel is responsible for one another. 

The dimension of the collective has already been born. This, in essence, will reveal the failure of Joseph's attempt to separate Benjamin from his brothers, as we will see in the next part of the narrative.

You can also join the Hebrew people on your daily behavior, as mentioned in Isaiah [54:6-7]
"And the foreigners who join with GOD to serve Him and... to be His servants... I will bring them to My holy mount, and I will cause them to rejoice in My house of prayer..." - Click here.

More Weekly Portions

律法為個人和社區帶來整體的福祉

Parashat Nasso在解決個人和家庭問題的同時,也強調通過大祭司的祝福,實現整體的團結和福祉。大祭司的祝福分為三個層次:強調物質和精神需求之間的平衡。

願神賜福給你,保護你--這是物質財富上的祝福。

願神臉上的光光照你,賜恩給你--這是通過學習律法書獲得的靈性的光照。

願神向你仰臉,賜你平安--這是與靈魂內在三個等級<Nefesh,Ruach,Neshamah>的緊密而深刻的聯繫。律法書為和諧整合個體和整體的福祉,給出了原則性的指導。

Beyond the Count: Individual Worth and Collective Unity
[Bemidbar]

Parshat Bamidbar discusses the commandment to count the Israelites, focusing on those eligible for the army. This count underscores the tension between collective and individual identities. The Torah uses the expression "number of names," signifying the importance of both the collective and the individual. The Torah teaches that true unity blends these aspects, with the collective gaining meaning through each individual's uniqueness. This concept is reflected in the principle of "generalization and specification" in scriptural interpretation, with hidden meanings in the numbers, explored through the gematria.

Tears of Exile, Seeds of Hope: The Unbreakable Bond Between God and Israel
[Bechukotai]

Parashat Bechukotai discusses the covenant between God and Israel, emphasizing the importance of repentance for redemption. The Talmudic debate between Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua delves into whether redemption is contingent on teshuva. Rashi's commentary interprets the ambiguous term "או" to support both views. This dual perspective highlights the Torah's open interpretation, showing that redemption can depend on human repentance or divine promise, reflecting a complex interplay of conditions in Judaism's understanding of historical progress.

Search